I am not sure how this stuff does not cause outrage of americans? 
The Vampire Squid Strikes Again: The Mega Banks' Most Devious Scam Yet | Matt Taibbi | Rolling Stone
"Today, banks like Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs 
own oil tankers, run airports and control huge quantities of coal, 
natural gas, heating oil, electric power and precious metals. They 
likewise can now be found exerting direct control over the supply of a 
whole galaxy of raw materials crucial to world industry and to society 
in general, including everything from food products to metals like zinc,
 copper, tin, nickel and, most infamously thanks to a recent 
high-profile scandal, aluminum. And they're doing it not just here but 
abroad as well: In Denmark, thousands took to the streets in protest in 
recent weeks, vampire-squid banners in hand, when news came out that 
Goldman Sachs was about to buy a 19 percent stake in Dong Energy, a 
national electric provider. The furor inspired mass resignations of 
ministers from the government's ruling coalition, as the Danish public 
wondered how an American investment bank could possibly hold so much 
influence over the state energy grid.
There are more eclectic interests, too. After 9/11, we found it 
worrisome when foreigners started to get into the business of running 
ports, but there's been little controversy as banks have done the same, 
or even started dabbling in other activities with national-security 
implications – Goldman Sachs, for instance, is apparently now in the 
uranium business, a piece of news that attracted few headlines.
But banks aren't just buying stuff, they're buying whole industrial 
processes. They're buying oil that's still in the ground, the tankers 
that move it across the sea, the refineries that turn it into fuel, and 
the pipelines that bring it to your home. Then, just for kicks, they're 
also betting on the timing and efficiency of these same industrial 
processes in the financial markets – buying and selling oil stocks on 
the stock exchange, oil futures on the futures market, swaps on the 
swaps market, etc.
Allowing one company to control the supply of crucial physical 
commodities, and also trade in the financial products that might be 
related to those markets, is an open invitation to commit mass 
manipulation. It's something akin to letting casino owners who take book
 on NFL games during the week also coach all the teams on Sundays.
The situation has opened a Pandora's box of horrifying new corruption
 possibilities, but it's been hard for the public to notice, since 
regulators have struggled to put even the slightest dent in Wall 
Street's older, more familiar scams. In just the past few years we've 
seen an explosion of scandals – from the multitrillion-dollar Libor saga
 (major international banks gaming world interest rates), to the more 
recent foreign-currency-exchange fiasco (many of the same banks 
suspected of rigging prices in the $5.3-trillion-a-day currency 
markets), to lesser scandals involving manipulation of interest-rate 
swaps, and gold and silver prices.
But those are purely financial schemes. In these new, even scarier 
kinds of manipulations, banks that own whole chains of physical business
 interests have been caught rigging prices in those industries. For 
instance, in just the past two years, fines in excess of $400 million 
have been levied against both JPMorgan Chase and Barclays for allegedly 
manipulating the delivery of electricity in several states, including 
California. In the case of Barclays, which is contesting the fine, 
regulators claim prices were manipulated to help the bank win financial 
bets it had made on those same energy markets.
And last summer, The New York Times described how Goldman 
Sachs was caught systematically delaying the delivery of metals out of a
 network of warehouses it owned in order to jack up rents and 
artificially boost prices.
You might not have been surprised that Goldman got caught scamming 
the world again, but it was certainly news to a lot of people that an 
investment bank with no industrial expertise, just five years removed 
from a federal bailout, stores and controls enough of America's aluminum
 supply to affect world prices."
"Do we even have a regulatory structure in place to look out for these 
new forms of manipulation? (Answer: We don't.) And given that the 
banking sector that came so close to ruining the world economy five 
years ago has now vastly expanded its footprint, who's in charge of 
preventing the next crash?"
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment